Cosmetics

Doc/Sd1/inheritance.xml

@@ -552,10 +552,12 @@ if (day.equals(Day.FRIDAY)) ...</programlisting>
             the <quote>==</quote> operator is sufficient. Due to the way <code
             language="java">enum</code>'s are being constructed instance
             creation is being limited to the underlying <code
-            language="java">enum</code>'s scope by its implicitly private
-            constructor. It is thus impossible to create new instances outside
-            the respective <code language="java">enum</code>'s scope.
-            Therefore object identity and equality of values are being
+            language="java">enum</code>'s scope by its implicitly <code
+            language="java">private</code> declared constructor. It is thus
+            impossible to create new instances outside the respective <code
+            language="java">enum</code>'s scope.</para>
+
+            <para>Therefore object identity and equality of values are being
             guaranteed to match exactly for two arbitrary instances belonging
             to the same <code language="java">enum</code> class:</para>
 
@@ -565,8 +567,8 @@ final boolean
   <emphasis role="red">objectIdentity</emphasis> = (e1 == e2),      // Both boolean values will
   <emphasis role="red">objectEquality</emphasis> = e1.equals(e2);   // always be equal.</programlisting>
 
-            <para>In case of <code language="java">null</code> values using
-            the <quote>==</quote> operator avoids
+            <para>As an aside: In case of <code language="java">null</code>
+            values using the <quote>==</quote> operator avoids
             <classname>java.lang.NullPointerException</classname>
             problems:</para>